[Grok-dev] Call for feedbacks : megrok.Resource
trollfot at gmail.com
Thu Feb 18 08:44:45 EST 2010
OK, I released a 0.4 version that is cleaned up (the dependencies and
It doesn't take the Martijn feedbacks in, yet. I need time to write a
I need to see, also, how to make the directive "resource" take the
modes, in a clean way.
And also, how to define the mode, in a simple grokish way. (maybe a
simple directive "mode")
2010/2/18 Souheil CHELFOUH <trollfot at gmail.com>:
> And, sorry, I read too quickly :
> The mode is only set via the hurry.resource.mode
> I didn't quite found a way to ease that use...
> Any idea is welcome, of course.
> 2010/2/18 Souheil CHELFOUH <trollfot at gmail.com>:
>> Thank you Uli, for the feedback
>> I certainly missed the dependency and i'm going to fix that quickly.
>> Yes, megrok.resource was meant to be for 1.1 and is currently used in
>> production for grok 1.1a2 sites.
>> As for the minified version, the option is not there yet !
>> Martijn was asking about it too, I shamely didn't include it.
>> Currently, it explicitly looks for depends and bottom.
>> I'm going to fix that and release a new version.
>> As a record, for everyone here, I did code a small extension, if
>> people are keen to try it :
>> It allows a merging and slimming of a ResourceLibrary component.
>> PS : i'll try to release the update in the coming hours
>> 2010/2/18 Uli Fouquet <uli at gnufix.de>:
>>> Hi there,
>>> Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
>>>> I wondered if any of you (except Christian Klinger, because I already
>>>> know), use the lib megrok.resource, which is a grok layer above
>>>> hurry.resource ?
>>>> Feedbacks would be more than welcome on that strategical library. I
>>>> have already an extension for it, but I need opinions and suggestions,
>>>> If you could take 5 min to write a note, I'll greatly appreciate it.
>>> After your posting I tried to build the KSS drag-and-drop example on
>>> using hurry.yui and hurry.zoperesource with Grok 1.0. That worked like a
>>> charm :-) Instead of adding lots of '++resource++' links in the header
>>> of the page template, I wrote an update method for the view that
>>> need()-ed the appropriate YUI-files. Clean, fast, nice :-)
>>> Afterwards I tried to use megrok.resource which didn't work in the
>>> beginning. The instance even refused to start-up complaining about a
>>> missing zope.site module.
>>> In fact zope.site is explicitly called in megrok.resource.traversal but
>>> not mentioned in setup.py requirements (it is mentioned, but only for
>>> I then made the zope.site import in traversal module conditional::
>>> from zope.site.hooks import getSite
>>> except ImportError:
>>> # BBB stay compatible with Grok 1.0
>>> from zope.app.component.hooks import getSite
>>> and that worked with Grok 1.0 (although I could not find out quickly how
>>> to enable minified inclusions, except via hurry.resource.mode() ).
>>> I then tried to run the megrok.resource tests using grok.1.0.cfg. That
>>> failed for similar reasons (zope.site required packages incompatible
>>> with this config). After removing zope.site from tests-requirement and
>>> applying the above fix, the tests ran fine (which is certainly not a
>>> solution). So, I assume megrok.resource is for Grok > 1.0 only?
>>> Best regards,
More information about the Grok-dev