[Grok-dev] Call for feedbacks : megrok.Resource

Martijn Faassen faassen at startifact.com
Thu Feb 18 09:11:22 EST 2010

Souheil CHELFOUH wrote:
> that's why "need" is still used :)
> The include for resource is only used on traversing
> You can use "need", it's what it's useful for

This definitely needs documentation. I think documentation on how to use 
it in combination with megrok.layout would also be valuable.

And I think a declarative way to do inclusions on at least layouts 
should also be supported.



More information about the Grok-dev mailing list