[Grok-dev] Update: Splitting out xmlrpc, traverser, rest...
faassen at startifact.com
Mon Jan 3 20:04:05 EST 2011
On 12/30/2010 12:54 PM, Uli Fouquet wrote:
> Was that intended (I see that especially the flash() method
> makes not much sense with XMLRPC/REST and it is generally difficult to
> bring application_url() back while the real implementation remains in
> grok.util)? I just want to make sure that this step has everyones
Definitely something to look into. I think flash messages indeed makes
less sense with XML-RPC/REST (though there might be use cases I'm okay
for taking this away), application_url seems useful?
More information about the Grok-dev