[ZDP] Re: [Zope] Zope vs CVS (Re: [ZDP] OpenContent issues)
Wed, 19 May 1999 09:18:52 -0400
Simon Michael wrote:
> I wrote:
> > CVS is used to provide & control access to the files.
> We also have the option to use zope to provide distributed access.
> This would be a good public demonstration of zope power.
> Some advantages of using CVS:
> - most powerful version control & logging of who did what
> - widespread & standard - excellent tools like cvsweb ready-made
> - supports working offline & merging with master copy
> Some advantages of using zope:
> - demonstrates zope to potential users
> - simple through-the-web authoring - CVS is too tricky for many
> - advanced functionality can be added if needed
> - learning exercise
IMO, a major disadvantage of CVS is that it is mostly "file"
oriented. In many (most) cases, multiple files evolve together.
It isn't correct to use a particular version file without using
compatible versions of other files. CVS has a feature to tag
collections of files to represent a configuration of files with
compatible versions, but you don't get to provide meta-data for tags
and tags are an advanced feature that seems somewhat "tacked on".
Zope, on the other hand, is transaction oriented. Zope tracks meta-data
for transactions, not individual objects. This is a much saner approach,
> I have been debating this zope/cvs issue myself, in regard to an
> intranet which I maintain which currently uses CVS to allow
> distributed authoring. Switching to zope will allow me to provide an
> easier interface & more features, but I don't want to give up the
> advantages of CVS either. I haven't thought of a good way to combine
> the two.
> Question: has the latest webDAV support resolved this dilemma, or will
> it soon ?
It will impact this issue eventually. I can't say how soon.
Jim Fulton mailto:email@example.com Python Powered!
Technical Director (888) 344-4332 http://www.python.org
Digital Creations http://www.digicool.com http://www.zope.org
Under US Code Title 47, Sec.227(b)(1)(C), Sec.227(a)(2)(B) This email
address may not be added to any commercial mail list with out my
permission. Violation of my privacy with advertising or SPAM will
result in a suit for a MINIMUM of $500 damages/incident, $1500 for