[ZODB-Dev] More timing data

Christian Reis kiko@async.com.br
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 15:22:38 -0200


On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:54:20AM -0500, Greg Ward wrote:
> Got some more timing data on open/close of FileStorage, with and without
> an index file.  My goal was to compare ZODB 3.1b3 (currently in use on
> our web site), ZODB 3.1 (what we *should* be using ;-), and current CVS
> trunk:
> 
> Executive summary: current CVS is 60% *slower* than 3.1 at opening a
> FileStorage with no .index file, and 12% slower at opening one with an
> .index file.  Haven't checked memory consumption.

Can we get some profiling data <wink> to see where the increase in time
is actually happening? If you have the time it would be great!

Take care,
--
Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil.
http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL