[ZODB-Dev] Writeperformance for different storages

[Jeremy Hylton]

>>>>> "AJ" == Andreas Jung <andreas@andreas-jung.com> writes:

  >> That's not bad actually, considering all the overhead (and
  >> benefits) of BerkeleyDB, but that does require gobs of memory and
  >> at least two independent disk controllers (one for the BDB log
  >> files and one for the data).  Plus some system-specific tuning of
  >> cachesizes, etc.

  AJ> So your conclusion is: there is nothing faster than FileStorage?
  AJ> :-)

Considering only write performance, then FileStorage does about as
little work as possible.  Most other databases work harder when they
are updated.

Jeremy