[ZODB-Dev] More "cPickleCache.incrgc" control (was: [Problem] "_v_" variables too volatile)

[Christian Robottom Reis]

On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 05:33:39PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Content-Description: message body and .signature
> In Dec. 2003, we have had an interesting discussion on how to provide
> more "incrgc" control -- especially how to prevent "_v_" variables
> to be flushed at subtransaction boundaries.

Dieter, I've been toying with this over the weekend, and I haven't been
able to find a reproducible case where this happens to write a testcase.
Can you outline an access pattern which causes a _v_ variable to be
flushed upon a commit(1)/abort(1)?

Take care,
--
Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331