[ZODB-Dev] Timeout in UndoSearch

Brian R Brinegar brinegar at ecn.purdue.edu
Wed Jan 14 16:44:28 EST 2004


Yes, each sequential batch takes longer than all previous batches combined.

-Brian

Jeremy Hylton wrote:

> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 14:01, Brian R Brinegar wrote:
> 
>>Is there something I should do so that this doesn't get lost?
> 
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=15628&atid=115628
> 
> The sourceforge bug tracker.  We haven't used it for a while, but we
> should get back in the habit, particularly with new bug reports from the
> 3.3a2 release.
> 
> One thing I don't understand about how undoLog() works, on reflection,
> is how it produces a link to the next set of results.  Say you do a
> search, but the machine is really busy, and it times about before you
> get any results.  Is there any way to restart the search where it was
> left off?  It looks like undoLog() doesn't return any information about
> how much work it did, so all the work would likely be repeated in this
> case.
> 
> Jeremy
> 
> 




More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list