[ZODB-Dev] Re: BTree corrupted after conflict resolution

Dieter Maurer dieter at handshake.de
Fri Mar 5 16:46:34 EST 2004


John Belmonte wrote at 2004-3-4 13:08 -0500:
> ...
>Note that this issue applies to BTree sets as well.  Is it unreasonable 
>to want a set of first-class persistent objects?

It is reasonable from an application point of view.

But, the current implementation implements this use case erroneously (in
case of conflict resolution).
You have three options: do not use it, fix the implementation, ensure
there will be no conflict resolution.

As Tim pointed out, fixing the implementation will be difficult.
Unless you take over this task, it will probably not be done in the
near future...

-- 
Dieter



More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list