[ZODB-Dev] Ordering before commit hooks

Jim Fulton jim at zope.com
Wed Aug 24 16:08:25 EDT 2005


Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote at 2005-8-23 14:22 -0400:
> 
>>...
>>
>>>>For example, you could have gotten to the same end here
>>>>with the old method, by registering your actions with an object of your own
>>>>creation, and registering just one commit hook with the transaction, where
>>>>that one hook looked at the actions you registered with your own object and
>>>>ran them in whatever order _it_ determined was best.
>>>
>>>
>>>Now plug and play comes into play:
>>>
>>>  Assume two packages developped by independent people
>>>  which all want to control the order of hook execution.
>>
>>Do we have evidence that such applications exist? So far, the
>>only example I've seen is one where an application wanted a handler
>>to go last. As I've pointed out in a separate note, this is achievable
>>without the change.
> 
> 
> I have a *package* (similar to Archetypes SQLStorage) that
> wants to go after everything that might possibly change attributes
> whether those changes are done by another component from me
> or any package developped by someone else.

So again, you don't need ordeing, you just want to go last.
Just register an intermediate hook that registers the real
hook when it is called.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim at zope.com       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org


More information about the ZODB-Dev mailing list