[ZODB-Dev] cache not minimized at transaction boundaries?
Chris Withers
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Wed Feb 1 08:21:02 EST 2006
Hey Toby,
Long time no "see" ;-)
Toby Dickenson wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 11:41, Chris Withers wrote:
>> Tim Peters wrote:
>>>> ...base ZODB cache targets on aggregate pickle size
>> All good, but still never gonna happen, right? *wry grinz*
>
> Sounds like a reasonable evening project (Ive no chance for ZODB fun in the
> day job any more), but Im sure it wont ever be the *most* interesting option
> without some sponsorship. Chris, do you have a real business requirement, or
> is this just an idle wish?
Sadly, for me, not a real business requirement... I know how the cache
works and so can make allowances.
For newbies, it does make death-by-swap an all too common phenomenon if
they don't see the connection between object size and memory used by the
cache...
How much work in terms of days/money do you reckon it would take?
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list