[ZODB-Dev] [Enhancement Proposal] Garanteed lifetime for volatile
variables
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Fri Oct 6 12:10:24 EDT 2006
Dieter Maurer wrote:
> I have put an enhancement proposal at
>
> http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/VolatileAttributeLifetimeGarantee
>
> It allows applications to declare that they need for
> some (so called sticky) objects a garanteed lifetime for their
> volatile attributes that extends until at least the next
> transaction boundary.
>
>
> This extension makes safe the use of volatile attributes for
> the following cases:
>
> * the storage of database connections in "Shared.DC.ZRDB.Connection"
>
> * the former use of "_v_skindata" in "Products.CMFCore.Skinnable"
> (now replaced by a much more complex, less efficient and not
> completely correct solution)
>
> * the use of "_v_is_cp" in "Archetypes.BaseObject"
> (and other use of volatile attributes for control purposes).
>
> This statement implies that the current use is unsafe.
>
>
> Feedback is welcome -- either in the Wiki or here.
I'm a little uneasy about baking this policy so deeply into
the infrastructure. I wonder if the use case can be handled
another way.
A persistent object can override _p_deactivate. For example:
def _p_deactivate(self):
pass
prevents an object from being turned into a ghost unless it is
invalidated.
You could implement your sticky attribute at the application level:
def _p_deactivate(self):
if getattr(self, '_p_sticky', False):
return
Persistent._p_deactivate(self)
You could provide any policy you want, without making the policy part
of ZODB.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the ZODB-Dev
mailing list