[ZODB-Dev] Repozo tests -- not

[Godefroid Chapelle]

Tres Seaver wrote:
> 
>>> - - Avoid shellling out to run repozo, but rather use its main(),
>>>   passing argv.
>> I thought of this but decided to not go that way to test that repozo can 
>> actually run on a living database. Even if the code that was there still 
>> needs to be modified to achieve that goal.
> 
> Computing the path to repozo to run as a script was a bit wonky:  I just
> changed the 'main()' function to take optional arguments, which also
> gave me more flexibility in how thigs run (e.g., turning off noisy output).

I suspect I do not express myself correctly.

I try to say that repozo should be tested against a database being 
mutated (the current test only exercise backups when the db is closed).

As far as I can understand, THE reason for repozo is to backup without 
stopping the ZODB.

-- 
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha) http://bubblenet.be