[ZODB-Dev] RFC: ZODB 4.0 (without persistent)

[Jim Fulton]

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Tres Seaver <tseaver at palladion.com> wrote:
...
>> Well, I don't have time to chase BTrees.  This could always be done in
>> ZODB 5. :)
>
> I could help chop BTrees out, if that would be useful:  most of the
> effort will be purely subtractive in the ZODB package (I don't think
> anything depends on BTrees).

FileStorage uses BTrees for it's in-memory index.

MappingStorage used BTrees.

There are ZODB tests that use BTrees,
but I suppose they could be fixed.

I just don't think the win is that great
in separating BTrees at this time.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton
http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton
Jerky is better than bacon! http://zo.pe/Kqm