SV: [Zope-CMF] Localization

Joachim Werner joe@iuveno-net.de
Thu, 1 Nov 2001 21:17:37 +0100


----- Original Message -----
From: "Magnus Heino" <magnus.heino@pleon.sigma.se>
To: "Joachim Werner" <joe@iuveno-net.de>; <zope-cmf@zope.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: SV: SV: [Zope-CMF] Localization


>
>
> > There is a patch in the ZBabel CVS that adds most of the
> > Localizer-style tag
>
> Why should I use ZBabel instead of Localizer?
>
> What is bettet? Why are you writing a replacement?

It's your choice ... - IMHO, it just doesn't make sense in the long run to
have two competing syntax standards around. I mean, no Product maintainer
will want to provide translations for more than one tool. I am deliberately
talking about syntax standards (or APIs if you want). I don't see a problem
with having different actual implementations of the API.

We are not writing a replacement, we are just improving ZBabel ...

Joachim