[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] CMF 1.5 roadmap?
fg at nuxeo.com
Thu Mar 11 10:59:30 EST 2004
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> | I also have paradigmal (if that's a word) problems about including
> | Archetypes, because I think having things defined at the class level
> | removes one level of indirection in defining things TTW which is very
> | useful and, I think, one of the strong points of CMF with its portal
> | types. I won't go into details here as it's another discussion entirely.
> I would like to hear a bit more about your ideas about Class Level
> vs. TTW here. As I pointed out, recently I integrated CMFMetadata with
> Archetypes, which allows for TTW editable metadata for Archetypes. It
> wouldn't take much more to have TTW schemas. (Although I agree that we
> should do away with the method generation thing, which is insane).
I'd like to expand a bit on this, but won't be available until after
next week... This mail just to show you I haven't forgotten :)
Florent Guillaume, Nuxeo (Paris, France)
+33 1 40 33 79 87 http://nuxeo.com mailto:fg at nuxeo.com
More information about the Zope-CMF