[Zope-CMF] [dev] CMFSetup backwards compatibility policy
jens at dataflake.org
Thu Jul 14 13:31:04 EDT 2005
On 14 Jul 2005, at 17:33, yuppie wrote:
> I don't think we should try to maintain code compatibility on HEAD.
> All we should promise is that imports of old profiles work and that
> we don't break the persistent SetupTool.
I suppose right now we're all a little bit in the air about what CVS
HEAD is going to become. Will it be CMF 2.0 or CMF 1.6? If we go the
more radical way to 2.0 it would be more permissible to have lesss
backwards compatibility I'd say...
More information about the Zope-CMF