[Zope-CMF] Re: [z3-five] Re: RFC: backporting including python-package-product support to support Zope 2.8

[Andreas Jung]

--On 18. Januar 2006 09:30:37 -0800 Alexander Limi <limi at plone.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:20:41 -0800, Andreas Jung <lists at andreas-jung.com>
> wrote:
>
>> --On 18. Januar 2006 09:03:15 -0800 Alexander Limi <limi at plone.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Note that I'm not saying it *won't* ship with 2.9, just that we reserve
>>> the right to ship with 2.8, since the 2.9 status is still uncertain,
>>
>> What is uncertain (except the issues with the Windows release)?
>
> The Windows release is a big part of what makes Plone interesting to new
> adopters, so that is the primary one.

ok

>
> In addition, I have yet to use a Zope release which didn't have serious
> problems in its .0 release. I'm not saying this *has* to be the case with
> the 2.9 release - just being realistic. ;)

I agree :-) But I would like to see reasonable feedback from the Plone 
community about any problems with 2.9.0 to have them fixed for you in 2.9.1.

-aj

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/attachments/20060118/f4b67946/attachment.bin