[Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities
jens at dataflake.org
Thu Sep 14 03:13:31 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 13 Sep 2006, at 13:06, Miles Waller wrote:
>> Personally, I'm neutral on moving the requirement for CMF 2.1 to
>> Zope 2.10. Obviously we're not using any of those new features
>> yet, but it would be nice to enable their use by mandating 2.10.
>> CMF 2.2 will move the bar higher I'd wager.
>> I'd love to hear some kind of yay/nay for making Zope 2.10 the
>> required platform for CMF 2.1 from some other people like Tres,
>> Yvo, Florent etc.
> One thing that would be good about this is that the CMFUid suite
> could be deprecated in favour of an implementation based on zope3's
> intids utility.
> There was a discussion a while back about the future of that
> package: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2006-April/
Yes, that would be a good thing, CMFUid isn't as "alive" as it was
hoped when the product was pushed into the CMF.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-CMF