[Zope-CMF] Re: Five's local sitemanager, CMF, etc

Rocky rocky at serverzen.com
Mon Feb 26 08:24:17 EST 2007

On Feb 23, 3:50 pm, Martin Aspeli <optil... at gmx.net> wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
> > Maybe I'm missing something. But wasn't a major goal of
> > five.localsitemanager to return acquisition wrapped tools?
> That was my understanding, too. I thought this would just mean
> aq_base'ing the utility and aq-wrapping it back into the context (the
> portal root). Without this, we start requiring users of the interface to
> know when aq wrapping is needed and do it explicitly with __of__() which
> I think we agreed was unacceptably detailed and ugly. :)

Alright, I've gone ahead and put code in place for this (albeit a bit
naively) with r72810.  The next question is whether we should be doing
the same with adapters and subscribers as well (even though this
doesn't affect the whole tools-getting-acquired-properly issue).

- Rocky

More information about the Zope-CMF mailing list