[Zope-Coders] Re: Changes to ZPublisher

Sidnei da Silva sidnei at awkly.org
Thu Oct 7 11:54:05 EDT 2004


On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
| >>I'm all for these cleanups, or a variation on them, but I'm strongly -1
| >>on them being included in the 2.7 branch. 2.7 is getting very stable
| >>now, and I don't want any kind of incompatibility problems added.
| >
| >Agreed. -1 for mucking with 2.7, even though I realize that it means 500
| >response codes will continue to propagate from Five running on 2.7.3+
| >
| 
| The changes are fine for 2.8, but not for 2.7 since there is a risk that 
| applications
| might break and we really don't want introduce new behaviour in the current 
| state.

It's not like something will break. I highly doubt that something is
depending on ZPublisher returning a 500 status code for not found
pages.

-- 
Sidnei da Silva <sidnei at awkly.org>
http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true
http://www.enfoldsystems.com
http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher

1: No code table for op: ++post


More information about the Zope-Coders mailing list