[Zope-dev] 'not:' kludgey?!

[Marc Lindahl]

on 5/10/02 11:32 AM, Chris Withers at chrisw@nipltd.com scrivened:

> Marc Lindahl wrote:
>> 
>> Don't you have that now with the kludgey 'not' construct?
> 
> What is kludgey about the 'not:' construct?!

For the reasons 'else' was invented in the first place, I guess:  prone to
errors, inefficient, bulky.  The biggest thing I see is: isn't linked to the
other construct, so it's prone to errors when editing the conditions.