[Zope3-Users] Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 3 on Jython - Google Summer of Code

[Jim Fulton]

On Mar 28, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
> +1 - I already mentioned this option as well. Note that existing Zope
> 3 applications can at least be made to run if you just let the
> proxying code do nothing and return the object itself, I imagine.
> They'll run insecurity, but they should run.

I'd rather not have something like this checked in anywhere.  I'd  
rather make it easier and more explicit to control whether proxies are  
used.

> Note that
> zope.interface was already ported at least some distance by the
> twisted people at Pycon.

Interesting.  Did anything get checked in to the z.o repo?

> I could therefore *imagine* focusing on some
> speedup work by rewriting bits of code to Java, but I agree with you
> that the primary, initial goal should be to get things to work, and
> that performance work should be secondary. So perhaps this can be in
> an 'optional-if-there-is-time-left' section, and going in with the
> assumption that time will not be left.

In particular, I'd prefer to see more of the stack get ported over  
speedups.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton
Zope Corporation