[Zope-dev] z3c.form 2.0 release?

Adam GROSZER agroszer at gmail.com
Sun May 24 05:31:34 EDT 2009

Hello Malthe,

Tiny problem is that the doctests seem to have the attributes in
lxml-sane order. That means just by removing lxml output-sanitization
even zpt output does not match the doctest.

Also, lxml is used to do some xpath queries.

Saturday, May 23, 2009, 10:23:16 AM, you wrote:

MB> 2009/5/23 Adam GROSZER <agroszer at gmail.com>:
>> The problem that I see here with lxml is that it is used for output
>> checking. Even worse z3c.form requires at least 2.1.1 of lxml, where KGS
>> 3.4 has lxml nailed at 1.3.6.

MB> It might be possible to shed this testing dependency; ``lxml`` is used
MB> because of its doctest-mode, but since then, Chameleon has been
MB> equipped to render attributes in the ZPT order (instead of more or
MB> less random). This was the raison d'etre to use lxml in tests.

>> This burpes already on buildout.
>> Now even if I would ignore this requirement for testing, (and testing)
>> how could I be sure that tests pass (with KGS 3.4)?

MB> Yes, I agree with that observation.

MB> \malthe
MB> _______________________________________________
MB> Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev at zope.org
MB> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
MB> **  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
MB> (Related lists - 
MB>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
MB>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )

Best regards,
 Adam GROSZER                            mailto:agroszer at gmail.com
Quote of the day:
What reason have atheists for saying that we cannot rise again? Which is more difficult: to be born, or to rise again? That what has never been should be, or that what has been should be again? Is it more difficult to come into being than to return to it? 
- Blaise Pascal 

More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list