[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 6, OK: 17

Adam GROSZER agroszer.ll at gmail.com
Mon Dec 3 08:15:31 UTC 2012


Hello,

On 12/02/2012 02:55 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Zope tests summarizer <noreply at zope.org> wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> [1]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
>>         https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069693.html
>>
>>
>> [2]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
>>         https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069694.html
>>
>>
>> [3]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
>>         https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069695.html
>>
>>
>> [4]    FAILED  winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
>>         https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2012-December/069696.html
>
> This is due to the release yesterday.
>
> I can and will "fix" this, by providing a test extra, but this will only
> cause no tests to run.  The fix may be needed for test of third-party
> packages that depend on ZODB3 [test].
>
> The winbot needs to be modified to run the tests for persistent,
> BTrees, ZODB and ZEO separately.

I think the winbot does the right job.
Those tests are running against

svn://svn.zope.org/repos/main/ZODB/trunk

Now the tests pass as you added [test] back:

Total: 3407 tests, 0 failures, 0 errors in 5 minutes 15.068 seconds.

http://winbot.zope.org/builders/ZODB_dev%20py_265_win32/builds/861/steps/test/logs/stdio

I just need to add a builder for ZEO now

-- 
Best regards,
  Adam GROSZER
--
Quote of the day:
How you look depends on where you go.


More information about the Zope-Dev mailing list