[ZWeb] New version 4.1.4c
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:00:06 +0200
I *really* dislike this version !
But it's hard to discuss about tastes and colors :-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Casey Duncan" <email@example.com>
To: "Olivier Deckmyn" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: [ZWeb] New version 4.1.4c
> I think I like the shaded version better. I know I said the original
> color was too bold, this one may be a tad too subtle. However I do like
> Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> > Here it is :
> > http://www.nidecker.net/zope.org/v4_1_4d
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > *From:* Ken Manheimer <mailto:email@example.com>
> > *To:* Olivier Deckmyn <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > *Cc:* email@example.com <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > *Sent:* Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:20 PM
> > *Subject:* Re: [ZWeb] New version 4.1.4c
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Olivier Deckmyn wrote:
> > > Hi Ken,
> > >
> > > > I still feel even more strongly that the page needs a stronger
> > delineation
> > > > between the left sidebar and the main body of the page.
> > Looking at it, it
> > > > became clearer that i would like to see a clear indication of
> > the left
> > > > margin of the body - like seeing the edge of a page in a book -
> > and that
> > > > light dotted line is not sufficient. Could you at least try
> > making that a
> > > > light but solid line? What i think i'd like to see is a a
> > light solid
> > > > line plus the same faint background color for the left sidebar
> > as you have
> > > > for the spotlight box. This would make the main text area
> > stand distinct,
> > > > without any spectacle.
> > >
> > > My opinion on this point is that we must try to keep an elegant
> > design
> > > balanced that serves usability.
> > > I also think that - as we use different text color for left and
> > content - it
> > > might not be necessary to have a larger line. But it might be
> > worth the try.
> > >
> > > Please do it and send me the files; i will upload them quickly.
> > Urgh - ok. See attached.
> > --
> > Ken
> > email@example.com