[ZWeb] DISCUSS: Misfeature in migration
alan runyan" <firstname.lastname@example.org
Sun, 19 May 2002 11:17:11 -0500
I dislike it as well. I do not believe bobobase_modification_time should
ever be used again. I dislike the name
and iirc its not really a application level attribute on objects (i think
its a ZODB level thing)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivier Deckmyn" <email@example.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: [ZWeb] DISCUSS: Misfeature in migration
> I dislike it. Could'nt one make a modification to the script to keep the
> date ?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Everitt" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: <Zope-Web@zope.org>
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2002 4:21 PM
> Subject: [ZWeb] DISCUSS: Misfeature in migration
> > Howdy all. I just realized something about the content migration that
> > might be an issue.
> > Basically, the creations/modification date for all zope.org content will
> > be moved to the date of the migration. We'll have no idea whether
> > something is two years old or two days old.
> > Do people think we can live with this?
> > --Paul
> > _______________________________________________
> > Zope-web maillist - Zopeemail@example.com
> > http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-web
> Zope-web maillist - Zopefirstname.lastname@example.org