[ZWeb] Re: Zope.net
Mon, 13 Jan 2003 13:49:37 +0100
On Monday, Jan 13, 2003, at 13:33 Europe/Paris, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 10:22:54AM +0100, Paul Everitt wrote:
> | It seems that you, Kapil, George, and I are talking about some of the
> | same ideas. I took a few minutes this morning to write up a
> | http://www.zope-europe.org/articles/200301/czolinkbase
> Very nice proposal. Some comments:
> - To solve the problem with ZODB we could store this on CVS, as you
> said, but *dont* add it to ZODB via XML-RPC. Instead, make it be
> served as a FS Directory View or similar.
> Problems: FS Dir View only updates when Zope is restarted. We need to
> fix this.
Note my constraints: must work with czo without creating new software.
I agree that, for nzo, your point is better. But it also adds a task
for nzo, which was prohibited in another constraint. :^)
> - To solve the problem with asking for content by date, we can
> develop a CMF Tool (for sites that use CMF) or a Zope Product (for
> sites that dont use CMF) that would query a catalog and build the
> RSS. This tool would be very configurable to allow using it on the
> most strange setups.
Yep, I agree. It's not a particularly challenging problem, to pass in
a date argument to the rss.xml URL and get back date-constrained
> Problems: need to convince site owners to install this product.
Yep. :^) We just need to get a couple of sites participating, then the
others will beg. :^)
> | And good god, how much longer will we be stuck with STX-NG? It
> | does what I expect. On this document it turned a line that said:
> | George added:
> | into a heading. To fix I had to do this:
> | George
> | added:
> | Does that seem natural? Bleh. Suckage. I suppose nzo will still
> | inflict STX-NG on us?
> You guessed it :) Of course we are free to add reSTX support on CMF,
> but you remember how clunky is the PUT support on Document? Well,
> thats something that would need to be refactored when adding reSTX.
Triple bleh. :^( STX is easy, except when it isn't.