[ZWeb] Re: Grrr. zope.org wikis are evil.
jens at dataflake.org
Mon Oct 9 19:40:46 EDT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 9 Oct 2006, at 17:10, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> I'll repeat that our commercial cluster is not the right place to
>>> zope.org. We can't really give volunteers the access to do what
>>> they need to
>> Please explain why? There is no commercial customers on the boxes
>> services are on, outside of the load balancer and squid, which are
>> necessary to make progress until things can be moved.
> Because to do what people want to do, they think they need full sudo.
> I'm not sure this is necessary. For example, it's possible that
> it would be enough for many interesting tasks to give people
> the ability to sudo to the user zope. We could do that.
> Giving root access to those boxes is not a risk that we're willing
> to take.
It's strange how that never used to be a problem before, and all of a
sudden it is. Jim, remember us exchanging emails in 2005 about
providing full sudo access for tasks like moving CMF from CVS to
Subversion? I still have that whole email exchange. There was no
discussion at all about full sudo access being a problem. Matter of
fact you were all for people stepping up to solve problems.
I would never have signed all those documents that gave me access as
a non-employee if I had known every root-access sysadmin task had to
be approved by ZC. If you take a look at http://www.zope.org/About
there is a specific systems admin group mentioned. That's what I
thought I signed up for. I guess I was mistaken.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Zope-web