Sat, 31 May 2003 10:53:24 +0200
Dieter Fischer wrote at 2003-5-30 12:02 +0200:
> Currently I'm trying to create a product, which (should) work(s) with
> several databases. So I've tested it now against ODBC (ZODBCDA/M$-Access)
> and PostgreSQL (ZPsycopgDA). The problem occures only with ODBC.
The problem might be M$-Access (I would not be astonished to learn
that it implements transactions in the way you have described (i.e.
the transaction does not see its own changes)).
Otherwise, "ZODBCDA" has a number of known problems (loosing "commit"s
does not belong to this set, though).
If possible, drop it in favour of (e.g.) ZmxODBCDA.