[Zope] ZMI shows owner, but no local role owner on object

[Sune Broendum Woeller]

Hmm, sorry, I guess I have been confusing owner local roles
with the real owner of an object.

See : 
http://zope.org/Documentation/Books/ZopeBook/2_6Edition/Security.stx

But now I'm a bit confused about how 
the owner gets set on an object if 
it is created by an anonymous user.

In my case it is created by code in a product,
activated by an anonymous user.

How is it determined which user to set as owner in
that case ? 

Sune



> 
> I have an object created by anonymous via
> some code in a product, that uses
> _setObject
> 
> In the ZMI the owner of the container is shown as owner
> of the object, but the object has no local roles. (No owner
> local role)
> It has no _owner attribute either.
> 
> The ZMI uses this to get the owner info (from owner.dtml):
> 
> This object is <dtml-if owner_info><dtml-with
> owner_info mapping>owned by &dtml-id; (&dtml-path;).</dtml-with
> ><dtml-else>unowned.</dtml-if>
> 
> Why does the ZMI show the object as having an owner, when
> it actually doesn't ?
> 
> found this on the list:
> (...) Also, is this a DTML document or
> DTML method, because methods seem to acquire the roles from their 
> container.
> (...)
> http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2000-March/106447.html
> 
> aquisition at play ?
> 
> But I recall that I have seen "This object is unowned" in the ZMI
> sometime.
> 
> 
> Sune
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope maillist  -  Zope at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
> (Related lists - 
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
>  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
>