[Zope] Re: Zope and mod_python
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Wed Feb 9 04:38:57 EST 2005
Tres Seaver wrote:
> This is the major benefit of the approach: sysadmins don't have to
> monitor / manage a separate daemon.
Well, you still need a seperate daemon for the storage server, but
granted, that's one less than the usual setup of Apache - Zope Web -
> Another potential benefit is that
> each child behaves as a single-threaded appserver, with no
> GIL-contention issues.
> A potential downside is that the child processes
> will not be able to reused the local ZEO client cache.
Well, I assume they'll keep the same client cache for as long as the
child process exists?
I guess it would be nice to find a way that child process could use a
persistent ZEO client cache, right? Does each child process need to have
it's own client cache (I'm guessing the way Pascal currently has it
working, that'll be the case, whether it's needed or not...) and if it
doesn't, is there any way the processes could share the cache in the
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
More information about the Zope