[Zope] why will FastCGI not be supported in the Future.

Andreas Jung lists at andreas-jung.com
Mon Nov 28 09:14:45 EST 2005


Bitte schick das auf die Liste. Ich habe keine Lust solche Diskussionen 
privat zu führen.

Danke,
Andreas

--On 28. November 2005 14:05:22 +0100 Gerhard Schmidt <estartu at ze.tum.de> 
wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 12:43:44PM +0000, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
>>
>> On 28 Nov 2005, at 12:28, Gerhard Schmidt wrote:
>> > I know there is a way to do just the same with mod_proxy, but
>> > mod_proxy does
>> > open new connection for every request while fastcgi uses the same
>> > connection
>> > for all requests. The is no problem on low load. But with growing
>> > load, this
>> > can become a Problem.
>>
>> Well, it's not "a way to do it", it's *the* way.
>
> Thats a real good argument. There is no *the* way. Every situation
> is different and having as mutch possibilities as possible is allways the
> best way to do it.
>
>> I highly doubt that your assertion about using more connections than
>> just one is a problem, under any circumstance. All very large
>> production sites that I ever dealt with use mod_rewrite/mod_proxy. It
>> simply is not a problem. Or do you have proof?
>
> Im runnig a very large site with 40000 users and a peak arround 60
> Requests per second. Having to call connect end all the routines that
> come with it   is quite an increased load. Why. FastCGI work perfectly
> and efficiently.  Thats exactly the usecase Fastcgi was developed for.
>
> In none of the Postings is an reason why FastCGI ist bad and therefore
> not  supported in the future. Just to say "so it is" is not an Answer.
>
> So my question is still there.
>
> Bye
>         Estartu
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --- Gerhard Schmidt    | Nick : estartu      IRC : Estartu  |
> Fischbachweg 3     |                                    |  PGP Public Key
> 86856 Hiltenfingen | EMail: estartu at augusta.de          |  on request
> Germany            | 					|
>



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20051128/bba59086/attachment.bin


More information about the Zope mailing list