[Zope] Re: Zope Foundation?

[Hadar Pedhazur]

Whoops. Sorry. I would have replied to the list, except that I didn't 
realize that you wrote to the list when I saw it in my personal email.

Here it is :-)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Zope Foundation?
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 10:20:00 -0400
From: Godefroid Chapelle <gotcha at bubblenet.be>
To: Hadar Pedhazur <hadar at zope.com>
References: <4911BBDAE4A6812BCE6596DA at suxmac> 
<dgev97$1hn$1 at sea.gmane.org>	<432BF47E.4030800 at bubblenet.be> 
<432C0823.40505 at zope.com>

Hadar Pedhazur wrote:
 > Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
 >
 >> Can the name of people that are part of this small committee be
 >> published ? I'd like to know who might be representing me, this way I
 >> can ask him or them about the direction taken and maybe actually give
 >> them my opinion.
 >
 >
 > I don't think this should be a problem, but I'll have to check with Rob
 > first, and then the people on the committee, to make sure they don't
 > mind being contacted. After all, they are "volunteering" their time, and
 > they might not want the extra burden of communicating with many
 > individuals.
 >
 > Still, this is a good idea, so I will float it early next week.
 >
 >> However, the starting point will be much more constructive if most
 >> members of the community that the Foundation claims willing to serve
 >> would have a chance to give their opinion on the bylaws as early as
 >> possible.
 >
 >
 > Agreed. To repeat, we will post everything before the Foundation gets
 > formed. Obviously, you (and everyone else) prefer to see it earlier
 > rather than later, but there will be time to comment.
 >
 >> This would avoid that the persons currently working in the small
 >> committee feel personally attacked when one of us dislikes or
 >> disagrees about some of the points and makes it known loudly... after
 >> a lot of hard work has already been done.
 >
 >
 > Also agreed, which is why they may prefer to stay anonymous ;-)
 >
 >> Ill finish with my usual recall that english is not my mothertongue
 >> and that it implies that I could be misusing some words without
 >> knowing about it.
 >
 >
 > This was perfect, no need to apologize :-)

Thanks for your quick answer.

Is there a reason not sending it to the list as well ?

I would appreciate if you would send it also to the mailing list.

Thanks
-- 
Godefroid Chapelle (aka __gotcha)  http://bubblenet.be