[Zope] Improved Zope Org Proposal

[Andreas Jung]

--On 25. Juni 2006 08:32:54 +0200 Lennart Regebro <regebro at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 6/24/06, Andrew Sawyers <andrew at sawdog.com> wrote:
>> There would be VERY limited things an individual could upload.  I
>> personally argued strongly for 0 membership on this site.  If the ideas
>> of micro sites went forward, the appropriate micro sites could allow (or
>> not) membership as necessary.
> [...]
>> > Who will decides which content is worth migration?
>> For the site I refer to, only that which meets the scope of the site.
>
> -MAXINT from me. You are trying to make a top run "managed" site. I
> think that is wrong for a collaborative software project by principle,
> and it also means that ZF will have to pay sometbdy to create content
> on the site, which to me seems to be a complete waste of money, when
> reasonably the community members should do that themselves.

I second the proposal to work with micro sites. A decoupled number of micro 
sites have the advantage to be less dependent on all other components which 
results in a better manageability. In addition the migration to micro sites 
can be done as ppl have resources. Ripping out a particular part of zope.org
(e.g. the collectors). would not much interfere  with the existing site.

-aj

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20060625/2b1ac715/attachment.bin