[Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Thu Apr 2 16:24:06 EDT 2009
Jim Fulton wrote:
> We and canonical use the Zope Framework. We don't use an
> application. Zope (aka Zope 2) is an extensible application. We (ZC
> and Canonical and others) assemble components from the Zope Framework
> to build our own applications.
Hmm, maybe I got this wrong, but Gary Poster expressed a strong concern
that "zope 3 the app server" needed to keep living.
I do think the name "Zope" should never be used on its own again.
I think "Zope Classic" would certainly work for "Zope 2 the app server",
it conveys the right things:
- maybe not the best choice for new development.
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
More information about the Zope