[Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
chris at simplistix.co.uk
Fri Apr 3 12:30:33 EDT 2009
Sascha Welter wrote:
> (Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:11:00PM -0400) Jim Fulton wrote/schrieb/egrapse:
>> I don't think we need A&B. Maybe just "Zope" and "Zope Framework".
> As long as both use the word "Zope", the confusion will continue.
Well, not quite, I think as long as any *one* of the bits uses the word
"Zope" on its own, there will be confusion...
> Why don't the Zope 3 people find a different name now, something that
> relates but is not the same?
I've already floated:
Zope 2 the app server -> Zope Classic
Zope 3 the app server -> Zope Advanced
Andreas doesn't like the former and two of the main people I thought
cared about "Zope 3 the app server" say they don't.
More suggestions please!
How about "Zope 2 the app server" -> Zope TAS 4.0?
Or even Zope Taz 4.0? Then we get a cute mascot :-)
> I understand that the developers would like everybody to move to shiny
> new Zope 3
I don't think "the developers" actually care what you use ;-)
> for a long time), those Zope 2 people won't move over by mistake. Even
> new people (who Chris so much despises landing on Zope 2)
That's not actually true, I just think it's evil to lead users down a
path (Zope 2 the app server on its own) when there are better (Grok,
Django, hell even Plone) available.
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope & Python Consulting
More information about the Zope