[Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
lists at zopyx.com
Sun Apr 12 03:52:18 EDT 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 12.04.2009 9:01 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Andrew Milton wrote at 2009-4-11 21:46 +1000:
>> So your position is, the code is fine, but, the docs suck so don't use
>> it. Well the docs have always sucked, the zope-3 docs don't seem any
>> better. Perhaps the people deprecating and removing interfaces willy-nilly
>> should document the replacements and how to change over existing consumers
>> of the removed interfaces, or re-implement the removed interfaces using
>> "the new way."
>> These are all issues for The Zope Foundation to address, not for you to
>> badger individuals who don't agree with your dogma-de-jour. Badger the
>> people responsible to do something.
> The people driving the Zope Foundation are (mostly) unfortunately heavily in
> favour of what they call "cleaning up code" and removing backward
The Zope Foundation is basically not in charge for dealing with
technical questions related to single projects like release management,
compatibility issues etc.
@Dieter: participate or be silent. You are member of the Zope community
for years, you are member of the Zope Foundation as a committer member.
Such statements are at most laughable based on your record of your
active contributions to the Zope community and the active participation
within the Zope community.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/attachments/20090412/dd77e3bc/attachment.vcf
More information about the Zope