[Zope] [Zope-dev] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...
peterbe at gmail.com
Mon Apr 13 10:03:30 EDT 2009
- Chris, I rarely agree with you but I actually like your fearless
and provocative bashing for the sake (hopefully) of stirring up some
- Andreas, you've done a great job with Zope but let's raise the bar
and not pass judgement on peoples opinions (especially not my personal
hero Dieter :)
- Andrew, I agree with very much of what you say. Just because Zope2
has flaws doesn't mean we should trash and burn it.
- Dieter, glad to hear it wasn't just me who had problems "keeping up"
with the backwards incompatible improvements. You seem like a guy
who's more in it for the results than the method.
Long live DTML!
2009/4/13 Andreas Jung <lists at zopyx.com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 13.04.2009 6:29 Uhr, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Andreas Jung wrote at 2009-4-12 09:52 +0200:
>>> @Dieter: participate or be silent.
>> I do not obey your orders.
>> You are Zope 2 release manager and part of the
>> Foundation board -- but you do not have command power over things outside
>> the Zope 2 release management and the foundation.
>> Thus, I will participate in the way I have participated so far (i.e
>> outside the circles controlled by the current Zope developers).
>> And I will not be silent but continue to criticize tendencies that
>> make Zope a less reliable platform for long living applications.
> As an open-source community we must not accept counter-productive and
> destructive participation.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Zope maillist - Zope at zope.org
> ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
> (Related lists -
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
More information about the Zope