[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope3 as a "generic" application server

[Shane Hathaway]

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:

> Indeed, but SQLObject isn't much different except that it requires you 
> to subclass SQLObject instead of Persistent. Ape only would have the 
> advantage that you could map already existing Zope3 content types to SQL 
> storages. Maybe in the future, we can have a mapper that inspects the 
> object's schema and does the rest augomagically :)

Well, that's exactly what Ape for Zope 3 would do.

While we're on the subject... several things are difficult in Ape just to
maintain compatibility with ZEO.  I'd like to simplify and drop ZEO
support.  Does anyone object?

Shane