[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope3 as a "generic" application server

[Christian Zagrodnick]

On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 16:35, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
> 
> > Indeed, but SQLObject isn't much different except that it requires you 
> > to subclass SQLObject instead of Persistent. Ape only would have the 
> > advantage that you could map already existing Zope3 content types to SQL 
> > storages. Maybe in the future, we can have a mapper that inspects the 
> > object's schema and does the rest augomagically :)
> 
> Well, that's exactly what Ape for Zope 3 would do.
> 
> While we're on the subject... several things are difficult in Ape just to
> maintain compatibility with ZEO.  I'd like to simplify and drop ZEO
> support.  Does anyone object?

Yes, I really would like to have full ZODB support in Ape.


-- 
Christian Zagrodnick

gocept gmbh & co. kg - schalaunische strasse 6 - 06366 koethen/anhalt
fon. +49 3496 3099112, +49 179 1463644
fax. +49 3496 3099118

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/attachments/20031212/af803d4c/attachment.bin