[Zope3-dev] Allowing views to be registered for classes ratherthaninterfaces.

[Jim Fulton]

Garrett Smith wrote:

...

> Developers have to go through ZCML to define class permissions. What
> about an option, in the content or class directives, to define an
> implicit interface -- like a macro. I'm not sure what this would look
> like...an 'interface' or 'schema' or multiple 'method/attribute'
> subdirectives.
> 
> This could serve the primary purpose, if I understand Jim's main
> concern, for explicit contract definition. It would also ensure that an
> interface and class were always in sync, eliminating the tedium that
> Martijn mentioned in an earlier message.
> 
> This is also a common Zope 3 pattern -- supporting certain
> definition/registration tasks in ZCML that would otherwise be required
> in Python.

I can't figure out what you are suggesting here.

Jim


-- 
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim@zope.com       Python Powered!
CTO                  (703) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org