[Zope3-dev] Re: Subversion repository layout
Jim Fulton
jim at zope.com
Tue Apr 27 05:56:08 EDT 2004
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 03:38:09PM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> [...]
> | Alternatively, we could have a top-level trunk directory:
...
>
> | Thoughts?
>
> Have you already decided how you are going to manage the database on
> the backend?
Yes.
> One option is to use one svn database for all of the projects. The
> disadvantage is that all projects will then share the same global
> revision number.
>
> Alternatively there could be one svn database per project and thus
> each project will have its own revision number sequence.
All of the projects will be in one repository/database.
Why?
- It makes sharing between related projects easier.
See my note over the weekend subject "Change in repository
approach to software sharing"
- Simpler repository management
- Revisiion numbers aren't al that meaningful anyway.
> This decision and the layout decision affect each other.
Somewhat. The layout most commonly used in the book
works better for project-pre-repository approaches.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:jim at zope.com Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714 http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com http://www.zope.org
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list