AW: [Zope3-dev] Re: Separate presentation packages

[Roger ineichen]

Garret wrote:
> I'd like to see modular functionality (hand waving) organized 
> as follows:
> 
>    modfoo
>    --------------------
>    modfoo/interfaces.py
I agree, it's clear what's inside the file

>    modfoo/modfoo.py or modfoo/_modfoo.py
I agree, give meaningful filenames inside a packeage and
     the "_" can be used for to show that from this file
     should not import directly.

>    modfoo/__init__.py + imports of modfoo.py/_modfoo.py (optional)
I agree, support a clear api and give us meaningful and short imports

>    modfoo/browser.py or modfoo/browser/ depending on UI complexity
I agree, separates UI stuff and can be used for modfoo/otherprotocol
I think browser is OK for the http protocol.

>    modfoo/*.py (other implementation modules)

I agree, this is what we used to do in the last couple month in zope3
and that was not bad to me.

I have nothing against other ideas, its just important to use a clear
concept which is easy to communicate to other people. 

For me is more important to fix a concept who all can live with and
and make shure everybody is working with. This give use more clear
structure and it's easier to browse the code. 
 

>   -- Garrett
> 

Regards 
Roger Ineichen

> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Zope3-dev at zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-dev
>