[Zope3-dev] Separate presentation packages

[Marius Gedminas]

On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 06:45:02AM -0500, Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Sunday 15 February 2004 11:39, Jim Fulton wrote:
> > So, I feel rather strongly that we should have packages like:
> >
> > folder
> > folder_browser
> > file
> > file_browser
> >
> > and so on. Note, again, that this separation is a good bit different
> > than what we have now. The presentation code is *close* to the application
> > code while still being separate.
> 
> Okay, the more I look at it, the more I like it. However, the underscore is 
> ugly and we should find a better notation/convention. I have no clue what 
> yet.

'folderbrowser' and 'filebrowser' look much more Pythonic to me than
'folder_browser' and 'file_browser'.  Underscores in package names feel
just too yucky for some reason.

Marius Gedminas
-- 
For Sale: Parachute.  Only used once, never opened, small stain.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-dev/attachments/20040217/f77e60ec/attachment.bin