[Zope3-dev] Re: Packaging pre-proposal/notes

[Jeffrey P Shell]

+1

I hate the concept of 'folder_browser'

On Feb 17, 2004, at 5:09 AM, Stephan Richter wrote:

> HI,
>
> I am not quoting anyone here, because I want to take the discussion 
> one step
> back.
>
> The reason we suggested folder and folder_web in the first place was 
> to make
> it easier to develop new UIs. And this in turn was born from the 
> problem that
> it was not easy for us to deactivate the browser ZCML in a package.
> Therefore, I would really like to go back to
>
> folder
> folder/browser
> ...
>
> and provide a ZCML way of saying
>
> <disable>
>   <include package="folder.browser" />
> </disable>
>
> This way, if you you develop a new UI you can just declare
>
> <disable>
>   <include package="folder.browser" />
> </disable>
> <include package="srichter.folder.browser" />
>
> In my opinion this is much more sane than anything that we have 
> discussed
> concerning this branch of the debate.
>
> The rest of the packaging ideas, like factoring out components from 
> zope.app
> and creating smaller confined packages with good dependency 
> information and
> so on I really like.
>
> Regards,
> Stephan
> -- 
> Stephan Richter
> CBU Physics & Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
> Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
>
> _______________________________________________
> Zope3-dev mailing list
> Zope3-dev at zope.org
> http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope3-dev