[Zope3-dev] Re: Five and 2.9
Raphael Ritz
r.ritz at biologie.hu-berlin.de
Tue Jun 15 10:43:03 EDT 2004
Jim Fulton wrote:
>
> I heard that there was some discussion about the relationship between
> Martijn Faassen's "Five" project and future versions of Zope.
>
> I'd like to say, for the record, that I think Five is an important
> project. It is one of a number of projects to work out how to use
> features of Zope 3 in Zope 2. Most of the projects, such as the one
> here at Zope corp are not as public as Five. I can say, on our part,
> that this is not from a desire for secrecy, but from a lack of bandwidth
> to share what we have done. I applaud Martijn's effort to make this a
> broad and open effort. I view Five as an important step toward
> Zope 2.9 and encourage people to get involved with it. I certainly intend
> to be invlved as much as time allows.
>
Thanks for this clairification, Jim.
Alan, does that address your concerns?
Any reasons left, not to adopt the five approach to Zope 3?
Raphael
> Of course, Five will change over time, as we get more experience with it.
> As with any technology, this entails some risk for early adopters. I
> think,
> however, that we'll fairly soon identify the parts that are stable and the
> parts that are subject to change.
>
> Jim
>
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list