[Zope3-dev] Re: Merging schema & interfaces (was: "Sub interface")
Gary Poster
gary at modernsongs.com
Tue Mar 2 11:54:24 EST 2004
Casey Duncan wrote:
> Combinatorial...complexity...must...resist...
>
> all-the-worlds-a-functional-call-ly yr's,
;-) What I wrote are conveniences. What I wrote could probably be
slightly changed to support a variant that accepts a lambda as an
argument.
I think that some basic invariants are useful as individual functions,
since it aids readability to the people I've shown the interfaces to.
I'd argue that there is a line to be drawn along a continuum between
"everything's a lambda" and "we have a huge library of barely-used,
simple invariants", rather than a "simple helper invariants are bad"
rule. YMMV, of course. :-)
Gary
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list