[Zope3-dev] Re: Zope 3.0, and why I won't use it
Fred Drake
fdrake at gmail.com
Tue Nov 16 11:32:10 EST 2004
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:15:38 -0500, Jim Fulton <jim at zope.com> wrote:
> I question whether developers are well served by an installer.
I wasn't trying to suggest that "installers" are the way to go. I
think the need for a compiler for the Windows user is a problem, and a
binary installation is necessary (saying nothing of how that's
created).
I wrote:
> There's
> work needed to create an installer that can use this (perhaps packing
> up the "built" version of the software and installing it to a home
> specificed in the GUI).
Jim responded:
> This is non-trivial. Before this happens we'll have to convince
> the docutils sig that it's a good idea. *That* may be even harder
> than the technical change.
I didn't mean that the installer that does this needs to be a standard
disutils thing. It could be a simple Tk application that takes a
built copy of the software and some user input, and runs the "setup.py
install --skip-build" with whatever additional options make sense.
> Given how much work we put into this and how far short we ended
> up, it seems strange to talk about these issues as if they were
> minor.
The distance is partly a question of where we want to end up. I'm not
terribly interested in ending up on Windows, so I'm happy to skip all
additional work here. ;-)
-Fred
--
Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at gmail.com>
Zope Corporation
More information about the Zope3-dev
mailing list