[Zope3-dev] Form framework, adapters and pau

[Jim Fulton]

Dominik Huber wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote:
> 
...
>> Here are 2 other alternatives to consider:
>>
>> 1. Add a "locate" option to the adapter directive, which
>>    defaults to false.  If true (locate="1"), then a location
>>    proxy is always added to the adapter.
> 
> 
> Yup.
> -1 That's might be *to much explicitness* for dev

I really don't think so.

 > 1 and complecates the
> adapter directive too.

Actually, I think it simplifies it a little.  It separates trusted-ness
from location-ness.

>> 2. Option 1 but default to true if a non-public permission is
>>    specified.
>>
>> These alternatives are explicit and hande the case where
>> permissions are declared in a separate directive.
> 
> 
> In both sugestions the problem is not solved, that the public permission 
> declaration within the adapter directive cannot be adapted to all  
> trusted adapters, because the 'valid' security-declartations might be 
> registered within an addional <class...

I think you are mistaken.  If you declare permissions in a class
directive, you'd use a locate attribute in the adapter
directive, as in:

<adapter factory=".myFactory" trusted="1" locate="1" />
<class class=".myFactory">
    <require permission="X" interface="IX" />
    ...
</class>

In this case you'd get the location even though the adapter
directive doesn't specify a permission.

Jim

-- 
Jim Fulton           mailto:jim at zope.com       Python Powered!
CTO                  (540) 361-1714            http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation     http://www.zope.com       http://www.zope.org